1 00:00:39,964 --> 00:00:42,558 Hello, darling. Good Cabinet meeting? 2 00:00:42,724 --> 00:00:45,716 - Hmm. - Good Cabinet meeting, darling? 3 00:00:45,884 --> 00:00:49,638 - I want a triple Scotch! - As bad as that? Why? 4 00:00:50,844 --> 00:00:57,033 The financial crisis is much worse than we thought. All the Cabinet must make cuts. 5 00:00:57,244 --> 00:01:01,681 - Bernard, would you like a Scotch? - Yes, a large one, please. 6 00:01:01,884 --> 00:01:05,036 Humphrey should have seen this coming. 7 00:01:05,245 --> 00:01:09,442 I don't think he understands Economics. He did read Classics. 8 00:01:09,605 --> 00:01:11,993 Sir Frank is head of the Treasury. 9 00:01:12,204 --> 00:01:17,154 He's at an even greater disadvantage in understanding Economics. He's an economist. 10 00:01:17,365 --> 00:01:22,359 - Can't they see there's got to be cuts? - In other departments, not in their own! 11 00:01:22,525 --> 00:01:24,959 So you ordered a clampdown? 12 00:01:25,125 --> 00:01:30,153 - I can't do that. I'm only the Prime Minister. - But you're in charge. 13 00:01:30,365 --> 00:01:34,323 A leader can only lead by consent, consensus. That's democracy. 14 00:01:34,525 --> 00:01:37,517 - So who IS in charge? - Nobody, really. 15 00:01:37,685 --> 00:01:41,963 - Is that good? - It must be. That's what democracy is about. 16 00:01:42,165 --> 00:01:48,274 And I've got a deputation of MPs coming to see me about a pay rise I promised them. 17 00:01:48,484 --> 00:01:52,079 - What will you say? - That I deeply sympathise. I don't. 18 00:01:52,245 --> 00:01:54,634 That they fully deserve it. Not true. 19 00:01:54,805 --> 00:01:59,594 And that I shall make it my first priority as soon as the crisis is over. I shan't. 20 00:01:59,765 --> 00:02:03,758 If they vote themselves a whacking great pay rise, 21 00:02:03,925 --> 00:02:08,157 it doesn't do very much for the dignity of Parliament. It doesn't. 22 00:02:08,365 --> 00:02:13,359 - Are they underpaid? - Underpaid?! Backbench MPs? Darling... 23 00:02:13,564 --> 00:02:16,557 Being an MP is a vast, subsidised ego trip. 24 00:02:16,724 --> 00:02:22,640 You need no qualifications, no compulsory hours of work, no performance standards. 25 00:02:23,645 --> 00:02:28,673 A warm room and subsidised meals for a bunch of self-opinionated windbags and busybodies 26 00:02:29,685 --> 00:02:34,679 who suddenly find people taking them seriously because they've got ''MP'' after their names! 27 00:02:34,844 --> 00:02:39,634 How can they be underpaid when there's about 200 applicants for every vacancy? 28 00:02:39,805 --> 00:02:44,401 You could fill every seat 20 times over even if they paid to do the job! 29 00:02:44,605 --> 00:02:47,199 You were a backbench MP only 5 years ago. 30 00:02:47,365 --> 00:02:49,753 I was the exception. 31 00:02:49,925 --> 00:02:52,519 I was the cream. I rose to the top. 32 00:02:55,125 --> 00:02:58,674 - Do you think you'll shut them up? - Who knows? 33 00:02:58,884 --> 00:03:04,356 The public will never stand for an MPs' pay rise when we cut back on nurses and teachers. 34 00:03:04,564 --> 00:03:07,318 Oh, that's a much more serious problem. 35 00:03:07,525 --> 00:03:12,314 No, darling, much LESS serious. They can't vote against me till the next election. 36 00:03:12,485 --> 00:03:15,283 Backbenchers can do it at 10 o'clock tonight. 37 00:03:17,645 --> 00:03:20,557 Humphrey, I've just had a very stormy meeting with my backbenchers! 38 00:03:20,724 --> 00:03:24,718 - I'm so sorry. - If I had warning, I'd have softened them up. 39 00:03:24,884 --> 00:03:29,276 - Papers only arrived the night before Cabinet! - Most regrettable. 40 00:03:29,485 --> 00:03:35,117 It's up to you, Humphrey. You must insist that we get papers circulated earlier. 41 00:03:35,325 --> 00:03:40,115 Alas, there are grave problems in circulating papers before they are written. 42 00:03:41,444 --> 00:03:43,515 Why the sudden crisis? 43 00:03:43,724 --> 00:03:49,003 - Prime Minister, you must ask Sir Frank. - What would Sir Frank say? 44 00:03:49,205 --> 00:03:51,673 It is not for a humble mortal such as I 45 00:03:51,844 --> 00:03:56,634 to speculate on the complex and elevated deliberations of the mighty, 46 00:03:56,805 --> 00:04:01,594 but, in general, I think Sir Frank believes that if the Treasury knows something must be done, 47 00:04:01,765 --> 00:04:04,757 the Cabinet shouldn't have time to think about it.. 48 00:04:04,965 --> 00:04:06,364 Outrageous! 49 00:04:06,564 --> 00:04:11,355 - Yes, indeed. It's known as Treasury policy. - Suppose the Cabinet has questions? 50 00:04:11,564 --> 00:04:16,319 His view is on the rare occasions when the Treasury understands the questions, 51 00:04:16,485 --> 00:04:19,477 the Cabinet doesn't understand the answers. 52 00:04:19,685 --> 00:04:22,677 - Do you subscribe to that view? - I, Prime Minister, 53 00:04:22,845 --> 00:04:26,076 I merely try to carry out your wishes. 54 00:04:26,285 --> 00:04:31,074 I wish that in future all Cabinet papers be circulated at least 48 hours in advance. 55 00:04:31,245 --> 00:04:34,237 - Would you tell Sir Frank? - Yes, of course. 56 00:04:34,405 --> 00:04:38,000 I shall seek an audience with him at once. Thank you. 57 00:04:39,764 --> 00:04:44,156 Who does Frank think he is? At least Old Humpy knows his place. 58 00:04:45,324 --> 00:04:50,603 It was very loyal of him to tell me the truth. They usually all stick together, don't they? 59 00:04:50,805 --> 00:04:56,401 He's rather anxious because of your threat to make Sir Frank head of the home Civil Service. 60 00:04:56,605 --> 00:05:00,598 Of course. I wonder if I should do something about that. 61 00:05:00,764 --> 00:05:05,441 Or if there isn't something to be gained out of keeping them both in suspense. 62 00:05:05,644 --> 00:05:09,478 You gain an anxious Cabinet Secretary. Is that what you want? 63 00:05:10,564 --> 00:05:12,362 Hmm... 64 00:05:13,764 --> 00:05:16,153 He wasn't just unhappy about the cuts, Frank. 65 00:05:16,324 --> 00:05:20,637 He was very unhappy about your papers arriving at such short notice. 66 00:05:20,845 --> 00:05:24,439 I hope you explained it was because of America's policy change. 67 00:05:24,605 --> 00:05:27,596 My dear Frank, I defended you gallantly, 68 00:05:29,125 --> 00:05:32,595 leaving the Prime Minister in no doubt as to the real cause. 69 00:05:32,805 --> 00:05:35,399 Oh, good. Thanks. 70 00:05:36,805 --> 00:05:39,194 - I'll need his goodwill. - Why? 71 00:05:39,405 --> 00:05:43,795 We shall obviously have to bring in some form of pay restraint. 72 00:05:43,965 --> 00:05:48,560 The problem is, the MPs are being denied their pay rise 73 00:05:48,725 --> 00:05:52,559 just as we bring forward the proposed Civil Service pay rise. 74 00:05:52,764 --> 00:05:55,153 - Ah. That's an awkward one. - Yes. 75 00:05:55,324 --> 00:05:59,762 - One isn't interested for oneself... - Of course not. 76 00:05:59,965 --> 00:06:04,355 But one does owe it to one's junior colleagues. Ironic, isn't it, Frank? 77 00:06:04,524 --> 00:06:09,519 Trying to help them involves raising our own salaries, which we don't care about at all. 78 00:06:10,564 --> 00:06:14,319 And then we get accused of feathering our own nests! 79 00:06:14,524 --> 00:06:17,163 That's just another cross we have to bear. 80 00:06:17,365 --> 00:06:19,925 Yes. Envy, pure envy. 81 00:06:21,165 --> 00:06:25,636 You'd better get that proposal in fast before the pay restraint begins. 82 00:06:25,845 --> 00:06:28,233 The night before next Thursday's Cabinet. 83 00:06:28,405 --> 00:06:32,398 We can't let Ministers spend two days talking about it. 84 00:06:32,564 --> 00:06:35,158 They'll come up with stupid objections! 85 00:06:35,365 --> 00:06:38,004 And try to delay it until the pay restraint. 86 00:06:38,204 --> 00:06:42,197 Mm. Do you think it's all right to bounce the Cabinet two weeks running? 87 00:06:42,365 --> 00:06:46,358 - No alternative. - I-I-I was thinking, Humphrey. 88 00:06:47,365 --> 00:06:52,393 Perhaps it would be better if the proposal came from both of us. 89 00:06:52,564 --> 00:06:57,274 - Both of us? - Well, we are joint heads of the Civil Service. 90 00:06:57,485 --> 00:07:00,396 Not as I understand it, Frank. 91 00:07:00,605 --> 00:07:04,644 - Oh, I think so, effectively. - I think not, effectively. 92 00:07:04,845 --> 00:07:08,918 I look after the financial side and you the establishment side. 93 00:07:09,125 --> 00:07:14,643 But, Frank, with respect, the Cabinet Secretary is the de jure head of the Civil Service. 94 00:07:14,845 --> 00:07:19,634 With respect, Humphrey, the Cabinet Secretary and the Permanent Secretary to the Treasury 95 00:07:19,805 --> 00:07:22,365 are de facto joint heads of the Civil Service. 96 00:07:22,564 --> 00:07:27,161 Be that as it may, Frank, we can't put up the proposal together. 97 00:07:27,324 --> 00:07:29,713 I must remain aloof and judicial. 98 00:07:29,884 --> 00:07:35,278 You must make the running. After weighty consideration, I will come down on your side. 99 00:07:37,405 --> 00:07:40,043 All right. One other point... 100 00:07:40,245 --> 00:07:43,680 We don't want Cabinet to adjudicate on this. 101 00:07:43,884 --> 00:07:48,083 - They must refer it to an impartial committee. - Who should chair it? 102 00:07:48,245 --> 00:07:52,033 - What about Professor Welsh? - That silly old buffer?! 103 00:07:52,245 --> 00:07:54,554 - That silly old buffer. - Why? 104 00:07:54,764 --> 00:07:59,759 He's asked me to put him forward as the next chairman of the University Grants Committee. 105 00:07:59,925 --> 00:08:04,521 He's desperate for the job, so he'll understand what's required of him. 106 00:08:04,725 --> 00:08:07,523 What an excellent choice. 107 00:08:07,685 --> 00:08:10,074 Humphrey, I'm astonished. 108 00:08:10,245 --> 00:08:15,035 The Treasury has just cancelled half our spending plans due to the financial crisis 109 00:08:15,204 --> 00:08:20,643 and now they have the temerity to put forward a plan for a Civil Service pay rise! 110 00:08:20,845 --> 00:08:23,233 And you're bouncing it through Cabinet! 111 00:08:23,405 --> 00:08:28,843 I wanted all papers circulated 48 hours in advance. Do you think I'm a complete idiot? 112 00:08:32,164 --> 00:08:35,236 It is not for me to speak for Sir Frank. 113 00:08:35,445 --> 00:08:39,916 I'm asking you. Speak for yourself. You're head of the Civil Service. 114 00:08:40,125 --> 00:08:44,835 - Am I indeed? How gratifying! - For the moment. 115 00:08:45,044 --> 00:08:49,436 As Cabinet Secretary, I am most eager to reduce public spending, 116 00:08:49,605 --> 00:08:54,599 but as head of the Civil Service I'm responsible for the real dangers that arise administratively 117 00:08:54,764 --> 00:09:00,556 if a pay rise does not come through very soon. It's so difficult for me. I'm wearing two hats. 118 00:09:00,764 --> 00:09:03,233 Yes, isn't that rather awkward for you? 119 00:09:04,085 --> 00:09:06,678 Not if one is in two minds. 120 00:09:06,884 --> 00:09:09,159 Or has two faces. 121 00:09:13,445 --> 00:09:15,834 Perhaps I should relieve you of one of them? 122 00:09:16,044 --> 00:09:19,923 - Oh, no, no, no. I'm perfectly happy with both. - Faces? 123 00:09:20,125 --> 00:09:22,240 Hats! 124 00:09:22,445 --> 00:09:27,837 You see, Prime Minister, the problem is that low morale will lead to the danger of a strike. 125 00:09:28,004 --> 00:09:31,998 Think of the effect of that on the social services. 126 00:09:32,164 --> 00:09:35,952 And we are already experiencing difficulties in recruitment. 127 00:09:36,164 --> 00:09:40,841 - 10 applicants for every vacancy? - Yes, but the applicants are very low quality. 128 00:09:41,004 --> 00:09:46,398 With very few First Class degrees. Most of them...have Lower Seconds. 129 00:09:47,644 --> 00:09:49,840 I got a Third. 130 00:09:51,205 --> 00:09:55,596 That's all right for Prime Ministers. Sir Humphrey means civil servants. 131 00:09:55,804 --> 00:10:00,798 The point is, I couldn't get this through. There's already a backbench revolt looming. 132 00:10:00,965 --> 00:10:05,799 MPs will never agree to a pay rise for civil servants. And the Cabinet will be hostile. 133 00:10:06,004 --> 00:10:10,953 May I suggest that we just ask the Cabinet merely to agree to look at the application? 134 00:10:11,125 --> 00:10:15,515 Then we'll put the matter before an independent group of assessors. 135 00:10:15,725 --> 00:10:20,719 - Who would lead these assessors? - There's a very good man I could recommend. 136 00:10:20,884 --> 00:10:24,594 Professor Welsh. Very sound, very sensible, very careful. 137 00:10:24,804 --> 00:10:27,193 I heard he was a silly old buffer. 138 00:10:27,404 --> 00:10:31,398 I can't imagine who could possibly say such a thing! 139 00:10:33,205 --> 00:10:36,355 Since the most senior grades of the service really bear the heat of the battle, 140 00:10:36,524 --> 00:10:39,119 they should receive the greatest increase. 141 00:10:39,284 --> 00:10:41,673 Seems very fair to me. 142 00:10:41,845 --> 00:10:45,633 - So this would be the scale. - Right. 143 00:10:45,845 --> 00:10:49,803 - I haven't seen this, by the way. - Of course not. Most improper. 144 00:10:50,004 --> 00:10:55,601 Quite. Well, they're very significant increases for Under Secretaries, 145 00:10:55,764 --> 00:10:58,153 Deputy Secretaries and, um, 146 00:10:59,164 --> 00:11:01,725 those of us who, um... 147 00:11:01,924 --> 00:11:03,721 Exactly. 148 00:11:03,884 --> 00:11:06,274 About 43%. 149 00:11:07,164 --> 00:11:10,952 - Alas. - But no more than we've earned. 150 00:11:11,125 --> 00:11:13,558 I take it this paper is not for submission. 151 00:11:13,764 --> 00:11:18,155 My dear Humphrey, those are the submission papers. 152 00:11:20,565 --> 00:11:22,953 Oh, yes. 153 00:11:24,164 --> 00:11:28,397 - It only goes up to Appendix K. - Sorry. Six more to follow. 154 00:11:28,605 --> 00:11:31,995 Oh! No danger of their wading through all those. 155 00:11:32,164 --> 00:11:35,395 Where's the one-page summary for the Cabinet? 156 00:11:35,605 --> 00:11:37,994 The Janet and John bit? 157 00:11:38,205 --> 00:11:40,594 Here it is. 158 00:11:40,764 --> 00:11:45,554 It's more or less the same as last time. Comparable jobs in industry. 159 00:11:45,725 --> 00:11:50,845 - On whose salary are the comparisons based? - The directors of BP and IBM, naturally. 160 00:11:51,044 --> 00:11:56,278 You don't think that might be challenged as untypical and above average? 161 00:11:56,485 --> 00:12:01,479 No. Of course, we don't mention them by name. Just ''typical industrial firms''. 162 00:12:01,644 --> 00:12:06,399 Then we take our own examples of increases from the lowest point of the incremental scale. 163 00:12:06,605 --> 00:12:11,803 - As before. - Principal examples are there at the end. 164 00:12:11,965 --> 00:12:16,561 £3.50 a week for a messenger. £4.20 for a registry clerk. 165 00:12:16,725 --> 00:12:19,716 £8.20 for a scientific officer. Hardly anything. 166 00:12:19,884 --> 00:12:23,274 So it would be £26,000 a year extra for us? 167 00:12:26,404 --> 00:12:29,202 More or less. 168 00:12:29,365 --> 00:12:33,073 - You haven't mentioned that, I hope. - My dear Humphrey... 169 00:12:34,164 --> 00:12:39,158 Frank, you don't think there's a danger that someone might go into this in detail? 170 00:12:39,325 --> 00:12:44,318 - Not that there's anything wrong with it. - But who? Ministers are only briefed by us. 171 00:12:44,485 --> 00:12:47,044 We're all loyal members of the service. 172 00:12:47,245 --> 00:12:51,841 Yes. I'll get it in last item before lunch on the Cabinet's agenda. 173 00:12:52,004 --> 00:12:55,918 - They won't spend more than 5 minutes on it. - Plain sailing. 174 00:12:56,125 --> 00:13:00,118 Apart from the rigorous scrutiny of Professor Welsh. 175 00:13:02,725 --> 00:13:05,477 Your Chief Political Advisor is on the phone. 176 00:13:05,685 --> 00:13:08,562 Thank you. Put her through. ..Dorothy? 177 00:13:08,764 --> 00:13:15,033 I'm doing a paper on this Civil Service pay claim, but I can give an immediate response. 178 00:13:15,245 --> 00:13:18,999 - Yes, please. What's your answer? - It's a series of questions. 179 00:13:19,205 --> 00:13:21,798 - For me? - For Sir Humphrey. 180 00:13:21,965 --> 00:13:26,799 The claim is self-serving and inappropriate, and significant for what it leaves unanswered. 181 00:13:27,004 --> 00:13:31,794 - Right. Fire away. - You should treat this as highly confidential. 182 00:13:31,965 --> 00:13:34,604 First of all, you should ask what deduction... 183 00:13:36,565 --> 00:13:38,953 Yes... 184 00:13:44,205 --> 00:13:46,196 Triffic! 185 00:13:48,965 --> 00:13:54,163 Oh, George, that's for you, I think. All right for me to go in, Bernard? 186 00:13:54,325 --> 00:13:58,716 Uh, yes. Sir Humphrey, can I just mention one thing? 187 00:13:58,884 --> 00:14:01,274 Yes, Bernard? 188 00:14:01,445 --> 00:14:05,916 - There has been movement. - On what subject? 189 00:14:06,125 --> 00:14:09,720 On a subject we hoped for no movement. 190 00:14:09,924 --> 00:14:14,634 The Civil Service generally hopes there will be no movement on any subject! 191 00:14:14,845 --> 00:14:19,839 Uh, yes, what I mean is it's in relation to a subject that is normally wholly and exclusively 192 00:14:20,004 --> 00:14:24,157 within the control of the Civil Service that developments have developed. 193 00:14:24,365 --> 00:14:27,163 - You're speaking in riddles! - Oh, thank you. 194 00:14:27,365 --> 00:14:31,677 That was NOT a compliment, Bernard! Make yourself clear, please. 195 00:14:31,884 --> 00:14:34,274 I'm sorry, Sir Humphrey, my lips are sealed. 196 00:14:34,445 --> 00:14:39,235 I am referring to minutes that I was duty bound to make of a confidential conversation 197 00:14:39,404 --> 00:14:41,714 between the Prime Minister and an advisor. 198 00:14:41,924 --> 00:14:44,961 - Which advisor? - I cannot divulge her name. 199 00:14:45,164 --> 00:14:51,161 Thank you, Bernard. And this confidential advice was to do with the financial crisis? 200 00:14:51,365 --> 00:14:55,073 - No, much more important. - Not his silly nuclear strategy? 201 00:14:55,284 --> 00:15:00,200 - Much more important. - You don't mean the Civil Service pay claim?! 202 00:15:01,445 --> 00:15:03,834 I see. What do you advise, Bernard? 203 00:15:04,044 --> 00:15:09,038 I advise you consider your position carefully, perhaps adopting a more flexible posture, 204 00:15:09,205 --> 00:15:13,995 while keeping your ear to the ground, covering your retreat and watching your rear. 205 00:15:14,164 --> 00:15:16,918 Thank you, Bernard. You've been a great help. 206 00:15:17,125 --> 00:15:19,355 Actually, I haven't told you anything. 207 00:15:19,565 --> 00:15:24,558 - I should hope not. That's most improper. - Prime Minister, Sir Humphrey's here. 208 00:15:25,725 --> 00:15:27,681 Flexible. 209 00:15:29,164 --> 00:15:32,759 - Ah, Humphrey! Come in. - Thank you, Prime Minister. 210 00:15:32,924 --> 00:15:35,313 Tell me what you think of this. 211 00:15:39,085 --> 00:15:41,279 What do you make of it? 212 00:15:41,485 --> 00:15:46,274 - It is rather large for instant judgement. - Only read the one-page summary. 213 00:15:46,485 --> 00:15:49,955 - Ah. Oh, good. - Well? 214 00:15:50,164 --> 00:15:51,644 Well? 215 00:15:51,845 --> 00:15:56,235 Prime Minister, you place me in a very difficult position. 216 00:15:56,445 --> 00:16:02,360 Do I, Humphrey? You have to have loyalty to your colleagues, but also to Cabinet policies. 217 00:16:02,565 --> 00:16:05,637 - I agree. - You agree? 218 00:16:05,845 --> 00:16:07,562 - Yes. - With me? 219 00:16:07,764 --> 00:16:12,394 - I agree with you. - I...ah... I don't... Who do you agree with? 220 00:16:12,605 --> 00:16:15,596 - With you. - Not with Sir Frank? 221 00:16:15,764 --> 00:16:18,278 - No. - You're not arguing with me? 222 00:16:18,485 --> 00:16:20,282 No. 223 00:16:21,284 --> 00:16:23,673 Perhaps I haven't made myself quite clear. 224 00:16:23,845 --> 00:16:26,278 I agree with you! 225 00:16:27,685 --> 00:16:30,073 Well, what do you make of that pay claim? 226 00:16:30,284 --> 00:16:32,673 Well, it's not excessive in itself, 227 00:16:32,845 --> 00:16:37,839 but at a time of national stringency it is neither wise nor in the national interest. 228 00:16:38,004 --> 00:16:40,599 I don't like to criticise my colleague, but... 229 00:16:40,764 --> 00:16:45,554 In my view, Sir Frank, though no doubt acting from the best of motives, 230 00:16:45,725 --> 00:16:50,719 should have placed the good of the nation before the narrower interests of civil servants. 231 00:16:50,884 --> 00:16:53,604 You see, this claim raises serious questions. 232 00:16:53,804 --> 00:16:58,514 That's interesting. I've made a note of some questions, too. 233 00:16:59,565 --> 00:17:02,921 Good questions. Where did they come from? 234 00:17:03,125 --> 00:17:05,513 - Oh, occurred to me. - Yes. 235 00:17:05,724 --> 00:17:08,238 They're...VERY good questions. 236 00:17:08,404 --> 00:17:11,680 Yes, that's what I thought. What should we do? 237 00:17:11,884 --> 00:17:14,478 - We should ask them. - Ask who? 238 00:17:14,684 --> 00:17:18,279 Sir Frank. You ought to invite him here to discuss them. 239 00:17:18,444 --> 00:17:22,835 He may well know the answers. Indeed, he should know them. 240 00:17:23,004 --> 00:17:25,279 That's his job, after all. 241 00:17:25,484 --> 00:17:28,317 Yes. Thank you. Arrange that, Bernard. 242 00:17:28,484 --> 00:17:30,873 I must say I appreciate your impartiality. 243 00:17:31,044 --> 00:17:34,832 You'd gain quite a lot yourself if it were to go through. 244 00:17:35,044 --> 00:17:37,433 Well, I suppose so, Prime Minister, 245 00:17:37,604 --> 00:17:42,200 but I see the rewards of this job as the knowledge... 246 00:17:42,364 --> 00:17:48,041 ..that we've been of service to the nation, not to ourselves. Don't you agree, Prime Minister? 247 00:17:49,044 --> 00:17:53,515 - I agree. Thank you, Humphrey. - Thank you, Prime Minister. 248 00:17:56,284 --> 00:18:00,197 - Humphrey's very fair-minded, isn't he? - Oh, yes, Prime Minister. 249 00:18:00,964 --> 00:18:06,322 If there were a conflict of interests, which side are the Civil Service really on? 250 00:18:06,524 --> 00:18:08,992 The winning side, Prime Minister. 251 00:18:15,964 --> 00:18:21,960 Ah, thank you, Billy. It was very painful for me not to be able to support Frank's case. 252 00:18:22,125 --> 00:18:25,116 - Deeply distressing. - But he was going to lose. 253 00:18:25,284 --> 00:18:30,881 And that Wainwright female had suggested that they stop us handling our own pay claims 254 00:18:31,044 --> 00:18:33,683 and let a Select Committee decide on them! 255 00:18:33,884 --> 00:18:38,275 Appalling! Next thing you'd have is politicians removing civil servants 256 00:18:38,444 --> 00:18:42,562 on the grounds of incompetence! The thin end of the wedge. 257 00:18:42,764 --> 00:18:47,155 Arnold, I need your help. Clearly, Frank's claim is discredited, 258 00:18:47,324 --> 00:18:51,715 but I need to get us the pay rise to consolidate my position. 259 00:18:51,884 --> 00:18:54,000 What did you do? 260 00:18:54,204 --> 00:18:58,402 - You say Frank used the normal formula? - That's right. 261 00:18:58,564 --> 00:19:02,159 - And you need 43%. Hm. - Thereabouts. 262 00:19:02,324 --> 00:19:06,317 Well, since virtually all the relevant staff work in London, 263 00:19:06,484 --> 00:19:11,274 start with a big increase in the London allowance. Allowances count as expenses. 264 00:19:11,444 --> 00:19:16,199 - They don't show in the percentage calculation. - London allowance. 265 00:19:16,404 --> 00:19:21,000 Then introduce a special graduate allowance for those with Firsts and Upper Seconds. 266 00:19:21,164 --> 00:19:25,396 - To aid recruitment. - Oxford doesn't give Upper Seconds. 267 00:19:25,604 --> 00:19:29,995 A second at Oxford counts as an Upper Second, at least. 268 00:19:30,164 --> 00:19:35,158 Then you double the Outstanding Merit awards. I take it people still get them? 269 00:19:35,364 --> 00:19:37,400 Oh, yes. Everyone. 270 00:19:37,604 --> 00:19:40,880 They don't count as rises either. Getting there? 271 00:19:41,084 --> 00:19:45,600 - That gets us down to only about 18%. - Since last time? 272 00:19:45,804 --> 00:19:50,400 Then don't calculate from last time. Calculate from 1973, the high point. 273 00:19:50,564 --> 00:19:56,355 And don't just take it to this year. Take it up to two years' time, the end of the claim period. 274 00:19:56,524 --> 00:19:59,641 Correcting for inflation, that should do it. 275 00:19:59,844 --> 00:20:05,237 Excellent. The percentage increases will sound all right now, but that still leaves a problem. 276 00:20:05,404 --> 00:20:09,443 The overall Civil Service pay bill will still be too high. 277 00:20:09,644 --> 00:20:14,035 - Easy. Reduce the size of the Civil Service. - What?! 278 00:20:15,924 --> 00:20:22,033 If the service were smaller than last time, a comfortable rise for individuals looks smaller. 279 00:20:22,244 --> 00:20:25,202 Real reductions in the size of the service?! 280 00:20:25,364 --> 00:20:29,039 It would be the end of civilisation as we know it! 281 00:20:29,244 --> 00:20:33,635 No, my dear Humphrey. All you do is stop calling them civil servants. 282 00:20:33,804 --> 00:20:36,193 Take the museums, for instance. 283 00:20:36,364 --> 00:20:41,961 If you turn them into independent trusts, the staff stop being classified as civil servants. 284 00:20:42,125 --> 00:20:46,914 They're still the same people doing the same job and still paid by government grants, 285 00:20:47,084 --> 00:20:52,078 but as it's a grant it doesn't count in the pay statistics. Unless anyone inquires closely, 286 00:20:52,244 --> 00:20:55,042 it will look like a cutback. 287 00:20:55,204 --> 00:21:01,279 - Can we set up so many trusts in time? - You won't have to. It only has to be planned. 288 00:21:01,444 --> 00:21:04,038 If it doesn't happen, it won't be your fault. 289 00:21:04,204 --> 00:21:09,039 Meanwhile, you should be able to get the rise to work out at 6% overall. 290 00:21:09,244 --> 00:21:14,034 - Thank you, Arnold. That's a great help. - Always happy to oblige. 291 00:21:14,204 --> 00:21:17,196 Especially with the birthday honours coming up. 292 00:21:19,884 --> 00:21:22,273 Should I talk to Frank about this, too? 293 00:21:22,484 --> 00:21:27,956 Em...oh, no, Arnold. Leave it to me. Frank's got a lot of problems coming up. 294 00:21:28,164 --> 00:21:33,113 - Really? He hasn't mentioned them. - Because he doesn't know about them yet. 295 00:21:35,044 --> 00:21:38,957 And Civil Service pay has fallen significantly behind comparable jobs in industry. 296 00:21:39,164 --> 00:21:41,359 What comparable jobs? 297 00:21:41,524 --> 00:21:46,154 Well, it's quite a complex formula, but it has been accepted for some time. 298 00:21:46,364 --> 00:21:51,154 I understand that a Permanent Secretary earns over £45,000 a year. 299 00:21:51,324 --> 00:21:56,352 Cabinet Secretary and Permanent Secretary to the Treasury earn in excess of £51,000. 300 00:21:56,564 --> 00:21:58,839 Um...maybe you're right. 301 00:21:59,044 --> 00:22:03,754 Don't you know how much you earn, Frank, or has it just slipped your memory? 302 00:22:03,964 --> 00:22:06,637 Yes, but if that's what industry is paying... 303 00:22:06,844 --> 00:22:10,837 - What do you think, Humphrey? - It's not for me to say. 304 00:22:11,004 --> 00:22:13,996 Sir Frank is in charge of Civil Service pay. 305 00:22:14,204 --> 00:22:17,799 - Prime Minister, may I ask a question? - Yes. 306 00:22:17,964 --> 00:22:20,876 What deduction do you make for job security? 307 00:22:21,084 --> 00:22:25,680 - I beg your pardon? - Top people in industry can get sacked. 308 00:22:25,844 --> 00:22:28,642 They can go bust, but your jobs are guaranteed. 309 00:22:28,844 --> 00:22:32,837 - There are swings and roundabouts. - What roundabouts? 310 00:22:33,004 --> 00:22:35,996 - Long hours. - Don't those happen in industry? 311 00:22:36,164 --> 00:22:39,042 Industrial leaders must stand by decisions. 312 00:22:39,244 --> 00:22:43,556 - So do civil servants. - Really? I thought ministers took decisions. 313 00:22:43,764 --> 00:22:48,758 - And the blame. That's the deal, isn't it? - Yes, ministers do take the decisions. 314 00:22:48,924 --> 00:22:52,075 Civil servants must decide how to carry it out. 315 00:22:52,284 --> 00:22:55,879 - Like a secretary laying out a letter. - Yes. 316 00:22:56,884 --> 00:22:59,842 No! Um... Sir Humphrey knows what I mean. 317 00:23:00,044 --> 00:23:04,401 It's up to you, Frank. You're in charge of Civil Service pay. 318 00:23:05,764 --> 00:23:08,881 What about the service element? 319 00:23:09,084 --> 00:23:11,552 Service element? What do you mean? 320 00:23:11,764 --> 00:23:13,561 Er... 321 00:23:17,164 --> 00:23:21,043 - The job has a strong element of service. - Absolutely. 322 00:23:21,244 --> 00:23:25,635 Rewarded by CBs and KCMGs and knighthoods...Sir Frank. 323 00:23:25,844 --> 00:23:27,880 To an extent. 324 00:23:28,084 --> 00:23:32,875 I wonder whether we shouldn't compare civil servants with directors of charities 325 00:23:33,044 --> 00:23:38,038 rather than industries. They get £17,000 a year on average, rather than £75,000. 326 00:23:38,204 --> 00:23:42,994 - That's an interesting proposal. - Oh, no, I don't think... We'd never recruit. 327 00:23:43,164 --> 00:23:47,077 Morale would plummet. I'm sure Sir Humphrey would agree. 328 00:23:47,284 --> 00:23:50,674 - Humphrey? - Well, it's my opinion that... 329 00:23:50,844 --> 00:23:53,438 ..Sir Frank is in charge of Civil Service pay. 330 00:23:53,604 --> 00:23:58,598 I do think the Prime Minister is entitled to an answer, Frank. 331 00:23:58,804 --> 00:24:04,879 - Then there are indexed pensions. - Oh, well, those were agreed a long time ago. 332 00:24:05,084 --> 00:24:09,077 - They're of considerable value. - Of value, yes, but modest. 333 00:24:09,244 --> 00:24:15,194 I have an estimate that it would cost £650,000 to buy back a Permanent Secretary's pension. 334 00:24:15,404 --> 00:24:17,679 - Absurd. - How do you value it? 335 00:24:17,884 --> 00:24:22,480 - Er, about £100,000. - In that case, I'll make you a deal, Frank. 336 00:24:22,644 --> 00:24:27,434 The government will buy back your pension and anyone else's who is willing to sell 337 00:24:27,604 --> 00:24:33,201 at your own valuation. We'll pay you £100,000 in cash for your pension rights. OK? 338 00:24:33,404 --> 00:24:39,195 I was talking out of my...off the top of my head. It could be...that is... 339 00:24:39,364 --> 00:24:41,639 I haven't calculated it myself. 340 00:24:41,844 --> 00:24:46,474 The figure of £650,000 comes from the Society of Insurance and Pension Actuaries. 341 00:24:46,684 --> 00:24:51,519 Yes, but when it was agreed I'm sure it was nothing like that. 342 00:24:51,724 --> 00:24:56,514 What about this for an idea? An indexed pension could be an alternative to honours. 343 00:24:56,684 --> 00:25:01,314 Every civil servant could choose to take his reward as honours or cash. 344 00:25:01,524 --> 00:25:03,833 - That's preposterous! - Why? 345 00:25:04,044 --> 00:25:08,003 - Yes, why? - Well, it, it, it, it, it... 346 00:25:08,164 --> 00:25:13,284 It would put us - put THEM - in an impossible position. Some already have honours. 347 00:25:13,484 --> 00:25:18,274 They could choose whether to renounce their honour or their pension indexing. 348 00:25:18,444 --> 00:25:23,438 What do you think, Sir Humphrey? Or will you be Mr Appleby? 349 00:25:24,564 --> 00:25:29,035 I'm sure that Sir Frank has gone into this very thoroughly. 350 00:25:29,244 --> 00:25:33,920 Not thoroughly enough. You'd stand to gain quite a lot personally. 351 00:25:34,125 --> 00:25:36,877 Prime Minister, that is not a consideration. 352 00:25:37,084 --> 00:25:40,963 You'd be happy to be personally excluded from this rise? 353 00:25:41,164 --> 00:25:44,156 I know the Cabinet Secretary would be. 354 00:25:44,324 --> 00:25:49,523 Well, of course, the question is... in essence...not as a precedent... 355 00:25:49,684 --> 00:25:52,278 ..thinking of the service as a whole... 356 00:25:52,444 --> 00:25:57,643 ..fr-fr-fr-from the long-term point of view... as a matter of principle... 357 00:25:59,564 --> 00:26:03,762 - Go on. - Well, of course... 358 00:26:03,924 --> 00:26:05,721 ..IF... 359 00:26:05,884 --> 00:26:08,876 ..if...the government did believe 360 00:26:09,044 --> 00:26:13,037 that senior people should be paid less than their subordinates, 361 00:26:13,204 --> 00:26:17,800 and if the principle were extended to Cabinet ministers and junior ministers. 362 00:26:18,004 --> 00:26:21,519 Anyway, Frank, thank you very much for coming in. 363 00:26:21,724 --> 00:26:24,522 Thank you, Prime Minister. 364 00:26:28,564 --> 00:26:33,957 - What do you make of that? A bit hard? - No. Most proper and penetrating questions. 365 00:26:34,125 --> 00:26:37,116 - What happens now? - I'd like a word in private. 366 00:26:37,284 --> 00:26:40,481 - I was just going. - Good. 367 00:26:40,684 --> 00:26:43,278 - Thank you very much indeed. - Dear lady. 368 00:26:43,444 --> 00:26:46,641 Not as dear as a Cabinet Secretary, Humphrey. 369 00:26:46,844 --> 00:26:53,158 This is so difficult for me. One does so hate to be disloyal to one's colleagues. 370 00:26:53,364 --> 00:26:56,356 Clearly you've never been a Cabinet minister! 371 00:26:56,524 --> 00:27:01,314 I'd felt all along, at a time of stringency, that the Treasury claim was too high. 372 00:27:01,484 --> 00:27:03,873 Not in the nation's interests. Very nice for us, 373 00:27:04,044 --> 00:27:09,038 but not something the Cabinet Secretary with his higher loyalty could recommend. 374 00:27:09,204 --> 00:27:14,597 It's why we don't let the Permanent Secretary to the Treasury be head of the Civil Service. 375 00:27:14,764 --> 00:27:19,360 So I've taken the liberty of drawing up a much more modest submission 376 00:27:19,524 --> 00:27:24,314 which is only 11% over two years with the top grades rising by only the average 377 00:27:24,484 --> 00:27:30,161 and the overall Civil Service pay bill going up by only 6% a year over the period. 378 00:27:30,364 --> 00:27:32,514 This looks much more reasonable. 379 00:27:32,724 --> 00:27:37,320 Yes. The lower grades will have to go through the normal procedures, 380 00:27:37,484 --> 00:27:41,796 but I suggest that the First Division claim should be processed with secrecy. 381 00:27:42,004 --> 00:27:45,394 - Secrecy? Why? - If there were widespread discussion, 382 00:27:45,604 --> 00:27:50,394 it might backfire. Some of our people might want to put in a much bigger claim. 383 00:27:50,564 --> 00:27:53,158 Much better to present a fait accompli. 384 00:27:53,324 --> 00:27:58,159 And may I advise against letting...advisors see it? 385 00:27:59,164 --> 00:28:02,236 Are you sure your colleagues would accept 6%? 386 00:28:02,444 --> 00:28:05,436 If I had your support and co-operation, yes. 387 00:28:05,644 --> 00:28:11,037 It's still got to get through Parliament. Backbenchers hate Civil Service pay rises. 388 00:28:11,244 --> 00:28:13,633 Oh! How interesting you should say that! 389 00:28:13,804 --> 00:28:18,195 I was just about to make a suggestion, a major reform. 390 00:28:18,364 --> 00:28:23,358 Well, if MPs' salaries were to be linked to a grade in the Civil Service, 391 00:28:23,524 --> 00:28:27,517 they wouldn't need to vote themselves pay rises all the time. 392 00:28:27,684 --> 00:28:30,676 If the Civil Service got one, they'd get one. 393 00:28:30,844 --> 00:28:33,642 And if MPs' pensions were index-linked, 394 00:28:33,804 --> 00:28:37,717 it would make them much less hostile to Civil Service pay claims. 395 00:28:37,924 --> 00:28:40,722 It certainly would. Excellent. 396 00:28:40,884 --> 00:28:43,876 - Thank you, Humphrey. - Prime Minister. 397 00:28:44,044 --> 00:28:46,399 What grade ought backbenchers be? 398 00:28:46,604 --> 00:28:50,597 - Senior Principals. - Isn't that rather low? 399 00:28:50,764 --> 00:28:53,073 Backbenchers are rather low. 400 00:28:53,284 --> 00:28:57,675 - And what grade for Cabinet ministers? - Under Secretaries. 401 00:28:57,844 --> 00:29:00,074 And the Prime Minister? 402 00:29:00,284 --> 00:29:04,277 Well, at the moment, you earn even less than I do. 403 00:29:04,444 --> 00:29:09,234 Why don't you grade yourself as a Permanent Secretary? 404 00:29:09,404 --> 00:29:13,716 - Thank you, Humphrey. - After all, this is a partnership. 405 00:29:13,924 --> 00:29:18,714 - Yes. A real partnership.- Yes, Prime Minister. 406 00:29:20,887 --> 00:29:30,321 http://episode-heaven.rt.hu